Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through links on Soundfindr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and servers) on. Learn more
52 Highlights 23 Differences 5 Reactions 0 Likes
Universal Audio Bock 251 vs Telefunken ELA M 251: 52 Highlights & 23 Differences — So, Which Microphone Actually Works Better
Get insight on sound, build, and usage scenarios to choose your perfect mic. Which one’s right for your setup — Universal Audio Bock 251 or Telefunken ELA M 251? We’ve compared their product type, power source, onboard controls & body material, usability, and sound so you can choose the better microphone.
Universal Audio Bock 251 vs Telefunken ELA M 251: A Deep Dive Into Legendary Tube Condenser Microphones
Both the Universal Audio Bock 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 are distinguished large diaphragm tube condenser microphones rooted in classic design and built for professional audio excellence. While they share fundamentals such as transformer-based design, multi-pattern switching, and condenser capsule technology, the two differ significantly in build era, feature nuances, and pricing.
The Bock 251, released in 2023, integrates modern manufacturing improvements, a versatile multi-mode switch with cardioid, bidirectional, and omnidirectional polar patterns, and a compact form factor appropriate for podcast and streaming setups. In contrast, the Telefunken ELA M 251, dating back to 2002, epitomizes vintage recording tradition with a broader frequency response reaching up to 20 kHz, three classic polar patterns (cardioid, omnidirectional, figure-8), and a distinct tonal warmth cherished in high-end studios.
Modern Sophistication Meets Classic Tube Sound: The Universal Audio Bock 251
The Universal Audio Bock 251 presents a cutting-edge interpretation of a revered vintage microphone. Built in the United States, it features a brass body with a durable nickel finish, combining aesthetic elegance with robust corrosion resistance and a thoughtful studio-grade built-in preamp to maintain pristine audio integrity. The microphone supports three polar patterns: cardioid, bidirectional, and omnidirectional, easily selected via a multi-mode switch with precise stepping. Catering mainly to the professional streaming and podcasting market, its relatively compact dimensions, 2" width, 1.58" height, and just 12 oz weight, make it easy to handle or integrate into desktop rigs.
Sonically, the Bock 251 shines with an equivalent noise level of 18 dB and an impressive headroom of 120 dB, which ensures clarity and helps capture dynamic vocal performances without distortion. Its max SPL of 118 dB suits a wide range of recording scenarios, from intimate vocals to louder instruments. The unit benefits from internal transformer design and is shielded well against RF interference, a boon in modern environments cluttered with digital devices. Additionally, the package includes essential cables and a hard carrying case for protection and easy transport.
Classic Vintage Brilliance: Telefunken ELA M 251's Timeless Appeal
Steeped in history, the Telefunken ELA M 251 evokes the golden era of studio microphones, delivering a rich, warm sound palette with a large diaphragm condenser capsule setup famous for nuanced tonal coloration. Manufactured in the United States and over two decades old, it remains a sought-after gem for vocal and instrumental recordings in professional studios. Unlike the Bock, it offers a more elongated form factor (8.5" height) and weighs about 1.31 lbs, reflecting its robust build quality and traditional engineering.
Audio-wise, the ELA M 251 boasts a wider frequency range starting at 20 Hz and extending up to 20 kHz, enabling it to capture subtle low-end details and crisp highs. It has an extremely low equivalent noise level of just 7 dB, making it exceptionally quiet and ideal for high-fidelity recordings. The max SPL of 138 dB accommodates louder sound sources without distortion, a considerable advantage when tracking brass or percussion. The ELA M 251 provides three classic polar patterns with stepped switching precision, supported by an external power adapter and a lengthy 25-foot cable suitable for expansive studio setups.
Its metallic champagne finish with nickel plating and included shock mount demonstrates attention to durability and aesthetic grace. The microphone also comes with a protective hard case, cables, and branded stickers, catering to users who appreciate the vintage hardware's feel and custom branding. Despite its considerable price point, typically more than double the Bock's cost, it remains a prestigious choice for studios prioritizing legendary tonal signature and heritage.
Quick Take
Universal Audio's Bock 251 impresses with its modern design, lower noise floor, and user-friendly features tailored for dynamic streaming and studio environments, all while delivering classic tube warmth at a more accessible price. Meanwhile, the Telefunken ELA M 251 stands firm as a historic powerhouse, offering wider frequency response and ultra-low noise performance coveted by high-end studios and professional artists focused on vintage sound excellence.
Bottom Line
For those searching for a superb, versatile tube condenser with up-to-date construction and smart features geared toward podcasting and professional streaming, the Universal Audio Bock 251 represents a top choice without the hefty premium. Conversely, if budget permits and your priority is the authentic, studio-classic sound with a proven pedigree, the Telefunken ELA M 251 remains unmatched for vocally rich and instrumentally detailed captures in professional studios worldwide.
Verdict
Winner: Universal Audio Bock 251 - Combines classic tube sound with modern design, lower noise, versatile polar patterns, and a much friendlier price point, perfect for today's podcast, streaming, and recording setups.
Runner-up: Telefunken ELA M 251 - Renowned for its vintage character, extended frequency response, and supreme dynamic range suited for legacy-focused professional studios, albeit at a significantly higher investment.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
Want clarity before your next studio or stage buy? We broke down Universal Audio Bock 251 vs Telefunken ELA M 251 in this microphones comparison — no fluff, just specs and real use insights.
The Universal Audio Bock 251 is named 'UA Bock 251', distinguishing it from the Telefunken ELA M 251, which carries the model name 'ELA M 251E'.
The specific product identifier from the manufacturer.
In the battle of Model Name, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 68 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Model Name on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
The Universal Audio Bock 251 was released in 2023, making it a much newer model compared to the Telefunken ELA M 251 which was released in 2002, appealing to users seeking modern designs.
Indicates when the microphone was launched.
In the battle of Year of Release, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 96 score measurement.
Based on community votes for Year of Release, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ earned 1 votes, more than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉, which got 0 votes.
I'm generally a fan of newer gear, so the 2023 release of the Universal Audio Bock 251 really appeals to me. While vintage mics like the 2002 ELA M 251 have their charm, I appreciate modern engineering and reliability. It just feels like a safer investment for the long run.
Both the Universal Audio Bock 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 are condenser microphones, indicating they share the same fundamental microphone technology for capturing audio.
Defines the basic category of the microphone.
In the battle of Product Type, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 69 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Product Type on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
0 Telefunken ELA M 251 0Votes Mixer, Audio Interface
vs Compatibility
Regarding compatibility, the Universal Audio Bock 251 works with an Audio Interface, while the Telefunken ELA M 251 is compatible with both a Mixer and an Audio Interface, offering more connection flexibility.
Lists supported platforms and devices.
In the battle of Compatibility, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 34 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Compatibility on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
The Universal Audio Bock 251 uses XLR as its connectivity type, similar to the Telefunken ELA M 251, which also features XLR connectivity, ensuring standard professional audio connections.
Defines how the microphone connects to devices.
In the battle of Connectivity Type, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 59 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Connectivity Type on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
The Universal Audio Bock 251 is categorized for Streaming applications, in contrast to the Telefunken ELA M 251 which is designated for Studio recording, suggesting different primary use cases.
Specific contexts where the mic is best suited.
In the battle of Recording Application Category, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Recording Application Category on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Intended Use
What is the intended use?
74 Universal Audio Bock 251 0Votes Podcast
0 Telefunken ELA M 251 0Votes Studio, Voice Recording, Instrument
vs Intended Use
The Universal Audio Bock 251 is primarily intended for podcasting, while the Telefunken ELA M 251 offers broader versatility, designed for studio use, voice recording, and instruments.
Describes the primary application area.
In the battle of Intended Use, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 74 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Intended Use on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Type
What is the mounting type?
59 Universal Audio Bock 251 0Votes Shock Mount
0 Telefunken ELA M 251 0Votes Shock Mount
Universal Audio Bock 251
The microphone's mounting type is a Shock Mount, which is specifically designed to isolate the microphone from vibrations and handling noise. This ensures a cleaner and more professional audio recording by preventing unwanted thumps and rumbles.
Telefunken ELA M 251
The microphone is designed for Shock Mount mounting, which effectively isolates it from vibrations transmitted through the microphone stand.
The typical mounting or support style.
In the battle of Mounting Type, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 59 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Mounting Type on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Country of Origin
What is the country of origin?
84 Universal Audio Bock 251 0Votes United States
0 Telefunken ELA M 251 0Votes United States
Telefunken ELA M 251
The Telefunken ELA M 251E is proudly manufactured in the United States, known for its meticulous craftsmanship and high-quality audio engineering.
Manufacturing or design origin.
In the battle of Country of Origin, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 84 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Country of Origin on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Form Factor
What is the form factor?
54 Universal Audio Bock 251 0Votes Side-Address
0 Telefunken ELA M 251 0Votes Side-Address
Telefunken ELA M 251
The Side-Address form factor means that the microphone is designed to pick up sound from its side, which is typical for large-diaphragm studio condenser microphones.
Describes the physical style of the microphone.
In the battle of Form Factor, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 54 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Form Factor on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Age Group
What is the age group?
99 Universal Audio Bock 251 0Votes Professional
0 Telefunken ELA M 251 0Votes Professional
Universal Audio Bock 251
This microphone is targeted towards a Professional age group or skill level, indicating its advanced features, high-fidelity audio capture, and robust build quality are suited for experienced users and demanding recording environments.
The intended user age bracket.
In the battle of Age Group, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 99 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Age Group on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
User Skill Level
What is the user skill level?
99 Universal Audio Bock 251 0Votes Professional
0 Telefunken ELA M 251 0Votes Professional
Telefunken ELA M 251
This microphone is typically used by Professional engineers and musicians due to its high-end performance, nuanced sound, and significant investment cost.
Recommended audience expertise level.
In the battle of User Skill Level, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 99 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the User Skill Level on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Series/Line
What series/line does it belong to?
Who knows? 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
0 Telefunken ELA M 251 0Votes ELA M
vs Series/Line
The Universal Audio Bock 251 does not specify a series or line, whereas the Telefunken ELA M 251 belongs to the 'ELA M' series, which might indicate a lineage or product family.
Identifies the product line or collection the microphone belongs to.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Series/Line on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Polar Pattern Type
What is the polar pattern type?
64 Universal Audio Bock 251 0Votes Figure-8
0 Telefunken ELA M 251 0Votes Cardioid, Omnidirectional, Figure-8
vs Polar Pattern Type
The Universal Audio Bock 251 features a Figure-8 polar pattern, whereas the Telefunken ELA M 251 offers multiple patterns including Cardioid, Omnidirectional, and Figure-8, providing greater recording versatility.
Identifies the default pickup pattern.
In the battle of Polar Pattern Type, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 64 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Polar Pattern Type on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Color Options
What are the color options?
69 Universal Audio Bock 251 0Votes Silver
0 Telefunken ELA M 251 0Votes Champagne
vs Color Options
The Universal Audio Bock 251 is available in Silver, while the Telefunken ELA M 251 comes in a Champagne color, offering distinct aesthetic choices.
Available product colors.
In the battle of Color Options, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 69 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Color Options on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Gender Target
What is the gender target?
99 Universal Audio Bock 251 0Votes Unisex
0 Telefunken ELA M 251 0Votes Unisex
The marketing target by gender (if specified).
In the battle of Gender Target, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 99 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Gender Target on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Launch Region
Where is it available?
99 Universal Audio Bock 251 0Votes Global
0 Telefunken ELA M 251 0Votes Global
Where the product is primarily available.
In the battle of Launch Region, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 99 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Launch Region on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Limited Edition
Is it a limited/special edition?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Whether the model is a limited or special release.
In the battle of Limited Edition, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Limited Edition on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Weighing 12 lbs (5.44 kg), the Universal Audio Bock 251 is considerably heavier than the Telefunken ELA M 251, which weighs 1.31 lbs (0.59 kg), indicating a substantial difference in portability and mounting requirements.
The microphone’s physical weight.
In the battle of Weight, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is worse than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 0.3 lbs measurement.
Based on community votes for Weight, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ earned 0 votes, less than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉, which got 1 votes.
The weight difference between these two mics is pretty substantial, and for me, lighter is better for handling and setup. The Telefunken ELA M 251 at 1.31 lbs is much more portable and easier to position compared to the Universal Audio Bock 251 which is listed at 12 lbs. That's a big factor for quick adjustments in the studio.
Who knows? 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
25 ft 0Votes
vs Cable Length
The cable length for the Universal Audio Bock 251 is not specified, whereas the Telefunken ELA M 251 includes a generous 25 ft (7.62 m) cable, providing extended reach for studio setups.
Length of the included or integrated cable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Cable Length on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Width
What is the width?
2 inch 0Votes
2.37 inch 0Votes
vs Width
The Universal Audio Bock 251 has a width of 2 inches (5.08 cm), making it slightly narrower than the Telefunken ELA M 251, which measures 2.37 inches (6.02 cm).
The microphone’s overall width.
In the battle of Width, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering lower 0.4 inch measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Width on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Depth
What is the depth?
2 inch 0Votes
2.37 inch 0Votes
vs Depth
The Universal Audio Bock 251 is 2 inches (5.08 cm) deep, while the Telefunken ELA M 251 is slightly larger at 2.37 inches (6.02 cm) deep, affecting its physical footprint.
The microphone’s overall depth.
In the battle of Depth, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering lower 0.4 inch measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Depth on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Height
What is the height?
1.58 inch 0Votes
8.5 inch 0Votes
vs Height
The Universal Audio Bock 251 has a height of 1.58 inches (4.01 cm), significantly shorter than the Telefunken ELA M 251, which stands at 8.5 inches (21.59 cm), making the latter a much taller microphone.
The microphone’s overall height.
In the battle of Height, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering lower 6.9 inch measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Height on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Width
What is the package width?
10 inch 0Votes
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The shipping package’s width.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Package Width on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Depth
What is the package depth?
8 inch 0Votes
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The shipping package’s depth.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Package Depth on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Height
What is the package height?
5 inch 0Votes
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The shipping package’s height.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Package Height on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Stand/Arm Length
What is the stand/arm length?
Who knows? 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum length of included stand or boom arm.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Stand/Arm Length on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Diameter
What is the capsule diameter?
1.3 inch 0Votes
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The diameter of the microphone capsule.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Capsule Diameter on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Length
What is the capsule length?
0.8 inch 0Votes
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The length of the microphone capsule.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Capsule Length on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Grill Diameter
What is the grill diameter?
2.1 inch 0Votes
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The diameter of the protective microphone grill.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Grill Diameter on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Thread Size
What is the mounting thread size?
99 Universal Audio Bock 251 0Votes 5/8"
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The thread size for mounting compatibility.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Mounting Thread Size on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Base Footprint Diameter
What is the base/stand footprint diameter?
Who knows? 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Diameter of the microphone base or stand footprint.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Base Footprint Diameter on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
The Universal Audio Bock 251 has an Equivalent Noise Level of 18 dB, while the Telefunken ELA M 251 boasts a much lower 7 dB, indicating the Telefunken mic produces significantly less self-noise for quieter recordings.
The self-noise generated by the microphone.
In the battle of Equivalent Noise Level, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is worse than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 11.0 dB measurement.
Based on community votes for Equivalent Noise Level, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ earned 0 votes, less than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉, which got 1 votes.
The equivalent noise level on the Telefunken ELA M 251 at 7 dB is seriously impressive. That's a huge difference compared to the Bock 251's 18 dB, making the ELA M 251 much better for capturing incredibly quiet sources without introducing unwanted hiss. For pristine audio, I'd definitely lean towards the Telefunken.
59 Universal Audio Bock 251 0Votes Large Diaphragm
0 Telefunken ELA M 251 0Votes Large Diaphragm
Universal Audio Bock 251
The microphone features a Large Diaphragm capsule type, which typically provides a wider frequency response and lower self-noise compared to smaller diaphragms. This makes it ideal for capturing rich, detailed vocals and instruments in studio settings.
Specifies the capsule style that influences sound capture.
In the battle of Capsule Type, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 59 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Capsule Type on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
0 Telefunken ELA M 251 0Votes Cardioid, Omnidirectional, Bidirectional
vs Directionality
Both the Universal Audio Bock 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 offer multi-directional capabilities, supporting Cardioid, Bidirectional, and Omnidirectional patterns for versatile recording.
General pickup orientation.
In the battle of Directionality, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 39 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Directionality on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
The Universal Audio Bock 251 has a Max SPL of 118 dB, meaning it can handle moderately loud sources, but the Telefunken ELA M 251 can withstand significantly louder sound pressure levels up to 138 dB, making it better for very loud instruments.
The maximum loudness before distortion.
In the battle of Max SPL, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is worse than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering lower 20.0 dB measurement.
Based on community votes for Max SPL, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ earned 0 votes, less than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉, which got 1 votes.
For recording really loud sources like drums or brass, the Telefunken ELA M 251's 138 dB Max SPL is a clear winner. The Universal Audio Bock 251 only hitting 118 dB might struggle and distort with those higher sound pressure levels. I need that extra headroom for versatile studio work.
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs Signal-to-Noise Ratio
The Universal Audio Bock 251 boasts a Signal-to-Noise Ratio of 76 dB, which suggests cleaner audio capture, a specification not provided for the Telefunken ELA M 251.
The clarity ratio between signal and background noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows? 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Range above nominal operating level before distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Headroom on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Describes the built-in preamp’s fidelity.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Internal Preamp Quality on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Frequency Response (Max)
What is the maximum frequency response?
18,000 Hz 0Votes
20,000 Hz 1Votes
vs Frequency Response (Max)
The Universal Audio Bock 251 has a maximum frequency response of 18000 Hz (18 kHz), while the Telefunken ELA M 251 extends higher to 20000 Hz (20 kHz, appealing to users seeking to capture more subtle high-end details.
The highest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Max), Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is worse than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering lower 2,000.0 Hz measurement.
Based on community votes for Frequency Response (Max), Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ earned 0 votes, less than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉, which got 1 votes.
A wider frequency response is always better for capturing the full richness of sound, which is why I prefer the Telefunken ELA M 251. Its ability to reach 20000 Hz means it captures more subtle high-end detail than the Bock 251's 18000 Hz. This makes a noticeable difference in the final mix.
See more
Microphone Type
What is the microphone type?
89 Universal Audio Bock 251 0Votes Condenser
0 Telefunken ELA M 251 0Votes Condenser
Universal Audio Bock 251
This is a Condenser microphone type, which is known for its high sensitivity, wide frequency response, and detailed sound capture. These characteristics make it ideal for studio recording of vocals and acoustic instruments.
Defines the operating principle of the microphone.
In the battle of Microphone Type, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Microphone Type on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs Acoustic Principle
The Universal Audio Bock 251 operates on a Pressure Gradient acoustic principle, a key design aspect, while this detail is not available for the Telefunken ELA M 251.
The underlying sound capture mechanism.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Acoustic Principle on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Transient Response
What is the transient response?
49 Universal Audio Bock 251 0Votes Medium
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Universal Audio Bock 251
The microphone exhibits a Medium transient response, indicating its ability to accurately capture the attack and decay of sounds. A medium response offers a balanced reproduction, suitable for a wide range of instruments and vocals.
Ability to capture sudden sound changes.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Transient Response on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Off-Axis Rejection
What is the off-axis rejection?
10 dB 0Votes
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Universal Audio Bock 251
The off-axis rejection is 10 dB, meaning sounds coming from the sides or rear of the microphone are attenuated by this amount compared to on-axis sounds. This helps to reduce unwanted room ambiance and background noise.
Sensitivity drop when sound comes from the side/rear.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Off-Axis Rejection on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Polar Pattern Switching Precision
What is the switching precision?
59 Universal Audio Bock 251 0Votes Stepped
0 Telefunken ELA M 251 0Votes Stepped
vs Polar Pattern Switching Precision
Both the Universal Audio Bock 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 feature Stepped polar pattern switching precision, allowing for distinct and repeatable pattern selections.
The accuracy of selectable polar patterns.
In the battle of Polar Pattern Switching Precision, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 59 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Polar Pattern Switching Precision on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Level
What is the output level?
-36 dBV/Pa 0Votes
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Universal Audio Bock 251
The output level of -36 dBV/Pa indicates the microphone's sensitivity. This value specifies how much electrical signal it produces for a given sound pressure level, helping users match it with appropriate preamps.
The output voltage relative to input pressure.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Output Level on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Transformer/Transformerless Design
What design does it use?
69 Universal Audio Bock 251 0Votes Transformer
0 Telefunken ELA M 251 0Votes Transformer
vs Transformer/Transformerless Design
Both the Universal Audio Bock 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 utilize a transformer design, which can influence their sonic character, often associated with a warmer tone.
The electrical coupling approach used.
In the battle of Transformer/Transformerless Design, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 69 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Transformer/Transformerless Design on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Frequency Response (Min)
What is the minimum frequency response?
10 Hz 0Votes
20 Hz 0Votes
vs Frequency Response (Min)
The Universal Audio Bock 251 captures lower frequencies down to 10 Hz, offering a wider bass response compared to the Telefunken ELA M 251, which starts at 20 Hz.
The lowest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Min), Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering lower 10.0 Hz measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Frequency Response (Min) on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Sensitivity
What is the sensitivity?
-36 dBV/Pa 0Votes
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs Sensitivity
The Universal Audio Bock 251 has a sensitivity of -36 dBV/Pa, providing a clear indication of its output level, a specification that is not available for the Telefunken ELA M 251.
Output level relative to sound pressure.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Sensitivity on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Dynamic Range
What is the dynamic range?
100 dB 0Votes
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs Dynamic Range
The Universal Audio Bock 251 offers a dynamic range of 100 dB, indicating its ability to handle both quiet and loud sounds effectively, whereas this information is not available for the Telefunken ELA M 251.
The range between quietest and loudest sounds captured.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Dynamic Range on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Minimum Terminating Impedance
What is the minimum terminating impedance?
1,000 Ω 0Votes
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs Minimum Terminating Impedance
The Universal Audio Bock 251 specifies a minimum terminating impedance of 1000 Ω, ensuring proper load for optimal performance, a detail that is not available for the Telefunken ELA M 251.
The minimum load impedance required for optimal microphone performance and to avoid signal distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Minimum Terminating Impedance on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Impedance
What is the output impedance?
150 ohm 0Votes
200 ohm 0Votes
vs Output Impedance
The Universal Audio Bock 251 has an output impedance of 150 ohms, slightly lower than the Telefunken ELA M 251's 200 ohms, which could influence compatibility with certain preamps.
Electrical resistance of the microphone’s output.
In the battle of Output Impedance, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering lower 50.0 ohm measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Output Impedance on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
THD
What is the THD (total Harmonic Distortion)?
1 % 0Votes
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Distortion added at high volumes.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the THD on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Gain Range
What is the gain range?
Who knows? 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The adjustable gain span.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Gain Range on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Pre-Attenuation Pad
What is the pre-attenuation pad?
Who knows? 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Built-in reduction for handling loud signals.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Pre-Attenuation Pad on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Low-Cut Filter
What is the low-cut filter cutoff?
Who knows? 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Removes low-end rumble.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Low-Cut Filter on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Stereo/Mono Mode
What mode is supported?
29 Universal Audio Bock 251 0Votes Mono
0 Telefunken ELA M 251 0Votes Mono
vs Stereo/Mono Mode
Both the Universal Audio Bock 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 operate in Mono mode, making them suitable for single-channel audio capture.
Determines recording mode.
In the battle of Stereo/Mono Mode, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 29 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Stereo/Mono Mode on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Isolation Feature
Does it have voice isolation?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Whether the mic includes isolation tech.
In the battle of Voice Isolation Feature, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Voice Isolation Feature on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Proximity Effect Control
Does it have proximity effect control?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Whether it has control for bass buildup at close range.
In the battle of Proximity Effect Control, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Proximity Effect Control on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Overload Point
What is the overload point?
130 dB 0Votes
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The SPL level where overload occurs.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Overload Point on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating
What is the acoustic noise isolation rating?
Who knows? 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Rating for rejecting ambient noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Both the Universal Audio Bock 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 include shielding against RF interference, which helps maintain signal integrity in environments with electromagnetic noise.
Indicates built-in protection against RF interference.
In the battle of Shielding Against RF Interference, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Shielding Against RF Interference on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows? 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Version of Bluetooth supported (if applicable).
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Bluetooth Version on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Connection Interface
What is the connection interface?
39 Universal Audio Bock 251 0Votes XLR
0 Telefunken ELA M 251 0Votes XLR
Universal Audio Bock 251
The microphone uses an XLR connection interface, which is a professional standard for balanced audio signals. This ensures high-quality audio transmission with minimal interference over longer cable runs.
Telefunken ELA M 251
The XLR connection interface is the standard for professional audio equipment, providing a balanced signal for optimal sound quality and noise rejection.
Defines the main interface for connectivity.
In the battle of Connection Interface, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 39 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Connection Interface on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Detachable
Is the cable detachable?
Yes 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
Yes 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
vs Cable Detachable
Both the Universal Audio Bock 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 feature detachable cables, allowing for easier storage, replacement, or customization of cable length.
Whether the cable can be detached or replaced.
In the battle of Cable Detachable, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Cable Detachable on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
The Universal Audio Bock 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 both offer Analog and Balanced audio output options, which are standard for professional audio connections.
Lists output signal formats available.
In the battle of Audio Output Options, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 69 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Audio Output Options on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
XLR Pin Configuration
What is the XLR pin configuration?
49 Universal Audio Bock 251 0Votes Standard
0 Telefunken ELA M 251 0Votes Standard
vs XLR Pin Configuration
Both the Universal Audio Bock 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 use a Standard XLR Pin Configuration, ensuring broad compatibility with audio equipment.
Specifies XLR wiring configuration.
In the battle of XLR Pin Configuration, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 49 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the XLR Pin Configuration on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Technology
What wireless technology is used?
Who knows? 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The wireless system type used.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Wireless Technology on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
RF Frequency Range
What is the RF frequency range?
Who knows? 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Frequency spectrum range for mics.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the RF Frequency Range on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
USB Compatibility
What USB versions are compatible?
Who knows? 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Identifies supported USB standards.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the USB Compatibility on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Phantom Power Support
Does it support phantom power?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Whether the mic supports phantom power.
In the battle of Phantom Power Support, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Phantom Power Support on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Interface Latency
What is the interface latency?
Who knows? 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Latency introduced by the interface.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Interface Latency on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Device Pairing
Does it support multi-device pairing?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Ability to connect to multiple devices simultaneously.
In the battle of Multi-Device Pairing, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Multi-Device Pairing on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Balanced/Unbalanced Output
What is the output type?
69 Universal Audio Bock 251 0Votes Balanced
0 Telefunken ELA M 251 0Votes Balanced
vs Balanced/Unbalanced Output
Both the Universal Audio Bock 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 provide a Balanced output, which is crucial for reducing noise over long cable runs in professional setups.
Defines the type of electrical signal output.
In the battle of Balanced/Unbalanced Output, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 69 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Balanced/Unbalanced Output on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Output Capability
Does it have dual output capability?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Ability to provide two simultaneous outputs.
In the battle of Dual Output Capability, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Dual Output Capability on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Ground Lift Switch
Does it have a ground lift switch?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Prevents ground loop hum in audio systems.
In the battle of Ground Lift Switch, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Ground Lift Switch on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
0 Telefunken ELA M 251 0Votes External Adapter, Powering Module
vs Power Source
The Universal Audio Bock 251 is powered by an External Adapter, while the Telefunken ELA M 251 can be powered by either an External Adapter or a Powering Module, offering slightly more flexibility.
Defines how the microphone is powered.
In the battle of Power Source, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 29 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Power Source on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Both the Universal Audio Bock 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 include a power indicator light, providing a visual cue of their operational status.
Whether a light shows power/battery status.
In the battle of Power Indicator Light, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Power Indicator Light on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
External Power Supply Compatibility
Is it compatible with an external power supply?
Yes 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
Yes 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
vs External Power Supply Compatibility
Both the Universal Audio Bock 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 are compatible with external power supplies, ensuring they can be integrated into various studio setups.
Can the mic run on external AC/DC supply.
In the battle of External Power Supply Compatibility, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the External Power Supply Compatibility on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Phantom Power Requirement
What is the phantom power requirement?
Who knows? 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the phantom power voltage needed.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Phantom Power Requirement on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Type
What is the battery type?
Who knows? 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The type of battery used if portable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Battery Type on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Capacity
What is the battery capacity?
Who knows? 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Storage capacity of the built-in battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Battery Capacity on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Life
What is the battery life?
Who knows? 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
How long the microphone operates per charge.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Battery Life on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Recharge Time
What is the recharge time?
Who knows? 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Time required to fully recharge the battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Recharge Time on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Consumption
What is the power consumption?
Who knows? 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Amount of power drawn during use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Power Consumption on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Power-Off
Does it have auto power-off?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Whether the microphone shuts down automatically when idle.
In the battle of Auto Power-Off, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Auto Power-Off on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Method
What is the charging method?
Who knows? 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The interface used for recharging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Charging Method on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Replaceable Battery Support
Does it support replaceable batteries?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Indicates if batteries can be swapped.
In the battle of Replaceable Battery Support, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Replaceable Battery Support on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Both the Universal Audio Bock 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 feature onboard controls in the form of switches, allowing for direct adjustments on the microphone.
Types of direct physical controls.
In the battle of Onboard Controls, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 74 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Onboard Controls on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Both the Universal Audio Bock 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 include a Multi-Mode Switch, enabling quick changes between different operational settings.
Shows whether the microphone includes a switch to toggle between different recording modes or polar patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Mode Switch, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Multi-Mode Switch on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Touch/Motion Controls, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Touch/Motion Controls on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
On/Off Switch
Does it include an on/off switch?
Yes 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
Yes 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
vs On/Off Switch
Both the Universal Audio Bock 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 are equipped with an On/Off Switch, providing convenient power control.
Whether the microphone includes a physical on/off switch.
In the battle of On/Off Switch, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the On/Off Switch on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Mute Function
Does it have a mute function?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Ability to mute audio directly on the mic.
In the battle of Mute Function, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Mute Function on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Gain Control
Does it have gain control?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Ability to adjust input gain directly.
In the battle of Gain Control, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Gain Control on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Headphone Monitoring
Does it support headphone monitoring?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Direct monitoring via headphone output.
In the battle of Headphone Monitoring, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Headphone Monitoring on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Monitoring Mix Control
Does it have monitoring mix control?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Lets user adjust mic vs playback audio mix.
In the battle of Monitoring Mix Control, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Monitoring Mix Control on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
LED Indicator Lights
Does it have LED indicators?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
Yes 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
vs LED Indicator Lights
The Universal Audio Bock 251 does not specify LED indicator lights, whereas the Telefunken ELA M 251 includes them, which can be useful for visual feedback on its status.
Lights that show status such as mute, levels, or power.
In the battle of LED Indicator Lights, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is worse than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the LED Indicator Lights on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
App/Software Integration
Is it integrated with software/apps?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Works with companion apps or software.
In the battle of App/Software Integration, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the App/Software Integration on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
EQ Presets
Does it have EQ presets?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Pre-configured equalization modes.
In the battle of EQ Presets, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the EQ Presets on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Effects
Does it include voice effects?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Built-in voice modulation effects.
In the battle of Voice Effects, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Voice Effects on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Feedback Suppression
Does it have feedback suppression?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Prevents audio feedback loops in live use.
In the battle of Feedback Suppression, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Feedback Suppression on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Automatic Gain Adjustment
Does it support automatic gain adjustment?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Auto-adjusts mic gain for consistent output.
In the battle of Automatic Gain Adjustment, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Automatic Gain Adjustment on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
One-touch Recording Button
Does it have a one-touch recording button?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
A single button to start recording instantly.
In the battle of One-touch Recording Button, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the One-touch Recording Button on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Lock Mode
Does it have a lock mode?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Prevents accidental control changes.
In the battle of Lock Mode, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Lock Mode on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Programmable Button Functions
Can buttons be programmed?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Allows customizing buttons to user preference.
In the battle of Programmable Button Functions, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Programmable Button Functions on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Sensitivity Preset Profiles
Does it have sensitivity presets?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Predefined sensitivity levels for various uses.
In the battle of Sensitivity Preset Profiles, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Sensitivity Preset Profiles on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Both the Universal Audio Bock 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 utilize Brass as their body material, a common choice for its durability and acoustic properties in high-end microphones.
The main structural material of the microphone body.
In the battle of Body Material, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 79 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Body Material on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Both the Universal Audio Bock 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 feature a Metal grill material, providing robust protection for the microphone capsule.
The material of the protective mic grill.
In the battle of Grill Material, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 49 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Grill Material on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Detachable Mount
Is the mount detachable?
Yes 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
Yes 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
vs Detachable Mount
Both the Universal Audio Bock 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 come with a detachable mount, offering flexibility for mounting options and easier transport.
If the mount can be detached for flexibility.
In the battle of Detachable Mount, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Detachable Mount on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Finish/Coating
What finish/coating does it have?
44 Universal Audio Bock 251 0Votes Nickel
0 Telefunken ELA M 251 0Votes Nickel
vs Finish/Coating
Both the Universal Audio Bock 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 feature a Nickel finish/coating, contributing to their classic aesthetic and durability.
Exterior treatment or surface finish.
In the battle of Finish/Coating, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 44 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Finish/Coating on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Shock Mount
Is a shock mount included?
Yes 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
Yes 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
vs Shock Mount
Both the Universal Audio Bock 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 include a shock mount, which is essential for isolating the microphone from vibrations and handling noise.
Whether a shock mount is included to reduce vibrations.
In the battle of Shock Mount, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Shock Mount on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Dampening Material
What is the internal dampening material?
89 Universal Audio Bock 251 0Votes Composite
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs Internal Dampening Material
The Universal Audio Bock 251 uses Composite as its internal dampening material, designed to reduce internal resonances, a feature not specified for the Telefunken ELA M 251.
The material used internally to reduce noise/vibration.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Internal Dampening Material on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Corrosion Resistance
Is it corrosion resistant?
Yes 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
Yes 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
vs Corrosion Resistance
Both the Universal Audio Bock 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 offer corrosion resistance, enhancing their longevity and reliability in various environments.
Indicates if materials resist corrosion.
In the battle of Corrosion Resistance, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Corrosion Resistance on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Pop Filter
Is a pop filter included?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Whether a pop filter is provided for plosive reduction.
In the battle of Pop Filter, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Pop Filter on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Windscreen
Is a windscreen included?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Whether a windscreen is included for wind noise control.
In the battle of Windscreen, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Windscreen on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Water Resistance
Is it water resistant?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Indicates if the mic is resistant to water.
In the battle of Water Resistance, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Water Resistance on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Dust Resistance
Is it dust resistant?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Indicates if the mic is resistant to dust.
In the battle of Dust Resistance, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Dust Resistance on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Drop Resistance
Is it drop resistant?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Indicates if the mic is designed to survive accidental drops.
In the battle of Drop Resistance, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Drop Resistance on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Adjustable Arm/Stand
Does it have an adjustable arm/stand?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Whether the arm/stand can be adjusted.
In the battle of Adjustable Arm/Stand, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Adjustable Arm/Stand on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Swivel/Pivot Capability
Does it have swivel/pivot capability?
Yes 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
Yes 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
vs Swivel/Pivot Capability
Both the Universal Audio Bock 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 offer swivel/pivot capability, allowing users to easily adjust the microphone's angle for optimal sound capture.
Whether the microphone head or stand can rotate.
In the battle of Swivel/Pivot Capability, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Swivel/Pivot Capability on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Foldable Design
Is it foldable?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Indicates if the mic or its stand can fold for portability.
In the battle of Foldable Design, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Foldable Design on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Resistance Rating
What is the heat resistance rating?
140 °F 0Votes
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum heat level the mic can withstand.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Heat Resistance Rating on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Neodymium Magnet
Does it use a neodymium magnet?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
States whether the capsule uses a neodymium magnet for stability.
In the battle of Neodymium Magnet, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Neodymium Magnet on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Shockmount
Is there an internal shockmount for the capsule?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Capsule isolation that reduces handling noise.
In the battle of Internal Shockmount, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Internal Shockmount on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
A carrying case is provided, offering convenient and secure transportation and storage for the microphone and its accessories. This helps protect the equipment from damage when traveling or not in use.
Whether a protective carrying case is part of the package.
In the battle of Carrying Case, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Carrying Case on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
A warranty card is included with the product, providing important information regarding the warranty coverage and terms for your purchase.
Whether a warranty card is included.
In the battle of Warranty Card, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Warranty Card on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Stand/Tripod, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Stand/Tripod on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Both the Universal Audio Bock 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 include cables, ensuring they are ready for connection right out of the box.
Indicates if connecting cables are provided.
In the battle of Cables, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Cables on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Packaging Type
What is the packaging type?
59 Universal Audio Bock 251 0Votes Hard Case
0 Telefunken ELA M 251 0Votes Hard Case
Universal Audio Bock 251
The microphone is packaged in a Hard Case, offering superior protection and durability for storage and transport. This ensures the microphone remains safe from impacts and environmental factors.
Telefunken ELA M 251
The microphone comes packaged in a robust Hard Case to ensure its protection during transport and storage, reflecting its premium status.
Defines how the product is packaged.
In the battle of Packaging Type, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 59 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Packaging Type on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Instruction Manual
Is an instruction manual included?
Yes 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
Yes 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Universal Audio Bock 251
An instruction manual is provided, offering comprehensive guidance on setting up, operating, and maintaining the microphone. This ensures users can fully utilize all its features and troubleshoot common issues.
Whether a manual or quick-start guide is included.
In the battle of Instruction Manual, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Instruction Manual on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Adapters
Are adapters included?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
States if adapter(s) are included (e.g., XLR to 3.5mm).
In the battle of Adapters, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Adapters on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Clip
Is a mounting clip included?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Whether a clip for attaching to stands/instruments is included.
In the battle of Mounting Clip, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Mounting Clip on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Extra Windscreen
Is an extra windscreen included?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Indicates if a spare windscreen is included.
In the battle of Extra Windscreen, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Extra Windscreen on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Spare Parts Availability
Are spare parts available?
Yes 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
Yes 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Whether the manufacturer provides replacement parts.
In the battle of Spare Parts Availability, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Spare Parts Availability on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Stickers/Branding
Are stickers/branding included?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
Yes 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Indicates if stickers or branded items are in the package.
In the battle of Stickers/Branding, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is worse than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Stickers/Branding on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Protective Foam Insert
Is protective foam included?
Yes 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
Yes 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Indicates if protective foam is part of packaging.
In the battle of Protective Foam Insert, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Protective Foam Insert on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Optional Windshield Model
What is the recommended windshield model?
Who knows? 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Manufacturer-recommended windshield model.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Optional Windshield Model on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
The microphone typically comes with a 2 years warranty, ensuring peace of mind for the user regarding manufacturing defects.
Duration of manufacturer warranty coverage.
In the battle of Warranty, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering equal 2.00 years measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Warranty on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Environmental Compliance
Is it environmentally compliant?
Yes 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
Yes 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Universal Audio Bock 251
This product demonstrates environmental compliance, indicating adherence to regulations and standards concerning ecological impact and sustainable manufacturing practices.
Compliance with eco/environmental regulations.
In the battle of Environmental Compliance, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Environmental Compliance on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
FCC/CE Approval
Is it FCC/CE approved?
Yes 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
Yes 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Universal Audio Bock 251
This product has received FCC/CE approval, meaning it complies with the electromagnetic compatibility and safety standards for electronic devices in relevant regions. This ensures the microphone operates without causing undue interference and meets safety requirements.
Explicit FCC/CE compliance approval.
In the battle of FCC/CE Approval, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the FCC/CE Approval on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
RoHS Compliance
Is it RoHS compliant?
Yes 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
Yes 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Universal Audio Bock 251
The product is RoHS compliant, meaning it adheres to the Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive. This ensures that the microphone is free from certain dangerous materials, reflecting a commitment to environmental safety and public health.
Restriction of Hazardous Substances directive compliance.
In the battle of RoHS Compliance, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the RoHS Compliance on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Compliance
Is it safety compliant?
Yes 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
Yes 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Indicates adherence to safety regulations.
In the battle of Safety Compliance, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Safety Compliance on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Professional Broadcast Certification
Is it broadcast certified?
Yes 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Indicates if the mic meets pro broadcast standards.
In the battle of Professional Broadcast Certification, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Professional Broadcast Certification on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Range (Operating)
What is the operating temperature range?
59 Universal Audio Bock 251 0Votes 32° to 104°F
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Operating temperature window for reliable use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Temperature Range (Operating) on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Advanced Features 15
Multi-Pattern Switching
Does it support multi-pattern switching?
Yes 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
Yes 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Telefunken ELA M 251
The ELA M 251E features multi-pattern switching, allowing users to select between Cardioid, Omnidirectional, and Figure-8 polar patterns. This versatility makes it suitable for various recording scenarios.
Ability to switch between multiple pickup patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Pattern Switching, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Multi-Pattern Switching on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
DSP Processing
Does it include DSP processing?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Built-in digital signal processing for sound shaping.
In the battle of DSP Processing, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the DSP Processing on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
AI Noise Cancellation
Does it feature AI noise cancellation?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
AI-powered suppression of background noise.
In the battle of AI Noise Cancellation, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the AI Noise Cancellation on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Beamforming Technology
Does it support beamforming?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Uses mic arrays to focus on sound sources.
In the battle of Beamforming Technology, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Beamforming Technology on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Tracking
Does it include voice tracking?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Automatically follows speaker’s voice.
In the battle of Voice Tracking, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Voice Tracking on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Recording Profiles
Does it have recording profiles?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Predefined sound settings for specific uses.
In the battle of Recording Profiles, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Recording Profiles on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Surround Capture Mode
Does it support surround capture?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Ability to capture immersive 360° or surround sound.
In the battle of Surround Capture Mode, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Surround Capture Mode on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Calibration
Does it support auto calibration?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Automatically adjusts mic response to environment.
In the battle of Auto Calibration, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Auto Calibration on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Low Latency Monitoring
Does it support low-latency monitoring?
Yes 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Provides near real-time monitoring with minimal delay.
In the battle of Low Latency Monitoring, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is better than Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ , delivering higher 89 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Low Latency Monitoring on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Smart Assistant Compatibility
Is it compatible with smart assistants?
Who knows? 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Integration with voice assistants.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Smart Assistant Compatibility on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Cloud Profile Storage
Does it support cloud profile storage?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Saves mic settings to the cloud.
In the battle of Cloud Profile Storage, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Cloud Profile Storage on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgrade Support
Does it support firmware upgrades?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Ability to update functionality via firmware.
In the battle of Firmware Upgrade Support, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Firmware Upgrade Support on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation
Does it feature acoustic modeling?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Simulates room acoustics or mic characteristics.
In the battle of Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Capsule Blending
Does it support dual capsule blending?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Blends outputs of dual capsules for tonal flexibility.
In the battle of Dual Capsule Blending, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Dual Capsule Blending on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Hum-Compensating Coil
Does it have a hum-compensating coil?
No 0Votes Universal Audio Bock 251
No 0Votes Telefunken ELA M 251
Indicates if the mic includes a humbucking coil to reduce electrical interference.
In the battle of Hum-Compensating Coil, Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ is same as Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Hum-Compensating Coil on Universal Audio Bock 251 ◉ vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Sound Quality
How would you rate the sound quality of this microphone?
Crisp and professional
0Votes
0Votes
Good and clear
0Votes
0Votes
Average clarity
0Votes
0Votes
Distorted and unclear
0Votes
0Votes
Noise Handling
How well does this microphone handle background noise?
Blocks out most noise
0Votes
0Votes
Handles noise fairly well
0Votes
0Votes
Reduces some noise
0Votes
0Votes
Picks up everything
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Life
How long does the battery last on this microphone?
Excellent — Over 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Long lasting — 10 to 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Decent — 5 to 10 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Short — 2 to 5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very short — Under 2 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Durability
How durable is this microphone based on build and lifespan?
Highly durable — Over 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Solid — 2 to 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Average — 1 to 2 years
0Votes
0Votes
Very fragile — Less than 1 year
0Votes
0Votes
Weight
How heavy is this microphone?
Ultra-light — Under 150 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Lightweight — 150 to 300 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Medium — 300 to 500 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Heavy — 500 to 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Very heavy — Over 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Design Appeal
How attractive is the design of this microphone?
Plain and boring
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat okay
0Votes
0Votes
Nice looking
0Votes
0Votes
Stylish and modern
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing
How do you feel about the price of this microphone?
Great value for money
0Votes
0Votes
Pretty good price
0Votes
0Votes
Fair deal
0Votes
0Votes
Kinda pricey
0Votes
0Votes
Crazy expensive
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitivity
How sensitive is this microphone to capturing sound?
Very sensitive — Detects quiet sounds clearly
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitive — Captures a wide sound range
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate — Picks up normal voice levels well
0Votes
0Votes
Low — Needs to be close to sound source
0Votes
0Votes
Very low — Struggles to capture soft voices
0Votes
0Votes
Frequency Response Range
What do you think about the frequency response range of this microphone?
Wide range — 20 Hz to 20 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Good range — 30 Hz to 18 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Decent range — 40 Hz to 16 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Limited range — 50 Hz to 14 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Narrow range — Above 60 Hz only
0Votes
0Votes
Connectivity
How stable and reliable is the connection of this microphone?
Supermod 
Moderator 
Recaptor 
0 Cartling 
